On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:51:21AM +0000, > Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 205 lines which said: > > > ... speaking of WGLC, what is the status of this? > > > > The recent set of changes and comments all look minor - did I miss > > anything, or does this look close to cooked? > > There have been very good feedback in Dallas (basically, to have just > one way of doing things, and to move every option such as > root-optimisation or qtype-preservation, to appendixes), and this > suggested to do some rewriting, which is not published yet. I will do > it, I promise, but it is, IMHO, too early for the WGLC. > Okey dokey. I've heard a number of people expressing support for the qname minimization idea (and I'm likely to mumble about it at the TLG meeting), so I mainly wanted to make sure that it wasn't just stuck in limbo. I'm happy to help with editing, etc if needed... W
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
