On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Joel Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Which means that the real question is whether the references need to be > understood to understand the registration. This judgment belongs to the > IESG, not to me. I reviewed based on my understanding. If the assignment to > Tor of .onion is for any use that Tor chooses, then indeed the references are > informative. If the assignment is for use for some specific problem and > behavior, then the references are normative. The wording of the draft led me > to believe it was the latter. In either case, the draft should be clear > about what it is doing.
The references seem pretty clearly to me to be informative. I don’t understand why there’s any thought that they need to be considered normative. You don’t need to read the TOR spec to tell whether or not a domain name is under the .onion special-use TLD.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
