On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:56:00AM +0000,
str4d <[email protected]> wrote
a message of 89 lines which said:
> If the problem is solely the stability of the reference, then here's
> an idea I don't think has been floated yet: include the Git revision
> in the normative reference.
This is already done by the RFC editor for the Wikipedia references,
for precisely stability reasons. For instance, in RFC 7626:
[dnschanger]
Wikipedia, "DNSChanger", October 2013,
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/
index.php?title=DNSChanger&oldid=578749672>.
While the version by the author just said
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSChanger>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
