Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > draft-spacek-dnsop-update-clarif, Spacek
Note that my 2317bis draft has a slightly different take on UPDATE vs classless reverse DNS. The UPDATE section of my draft is entirely due to Petr's draft, so I'm very grateful to him for pointing out the problem. I'm interested in opinions about - should this be a separate draft or is it sensible to put it in rfc2317bis? - is the indirection problem specific to classless reverse DNS (which is the approach I took) or does it apply everywhere (which is what Petr Spacek's draft says)? - is my detailed suggested UPDATE behaviour sensible? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis-00#section-9 Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Westerly or southwesterly 5 or 6, decreasing 4, then increasing 5 to 7 in northwest. Moderate or rough. Thundery showers. Good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
