On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > draft-spacek-dnsop-update-clarif, Spacek > > Note that my 2317bis draft has a slightly different take on UPDATE vs > classless reverse DNS. The UPDATE section of my draft is entirely due to > Petr's draft, so I'm very grateful to him for pointing out the problem. > I'm interested in opinions about > > - should this be a separate draft or is it sensible to put it in > rfc2317bis? > > - is the indirection problem specific to classless reverse DNS (which is > the approach I took) or does it apply everywhere (which is what > Petr Spacek's draft says)? > > - is my detailed suggested UPDATE behaviour sensible? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fanf-dnsop-rfc2317bis-00#section-9 > > Tony. > > The UPDATE behavior makes sense to me.
minor nit - The first paragraph in section 9 has "change revers DNS" which should be "change reverse DNS" -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
