Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The authors have updated their document to address all outstanding
> issues, and we feel the document is ready for Working Group Last Call.

The rationale for this document is still completely wrong. It does not
provide any reduction in latency compared to the existing DNS protocol.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <[email protected]>  http://dotat.at/
Biscay, Southeast Fitzroy: Southwesterly 5 or 6 in far north, otherwise
variable 3 or 4. Moderate or rough. Fair. Good.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to