On 9 Nov 2015, at 5:02, Tony Finch wrote:
Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
The authors have updated their document to address all outstanding
issues, and we feel the document is ready for Working Group Last
Call.
The rationale for this document is still completely wrong. It does not
provide any reduction in latency compared to the existing DNS
protocol.
Is that really true? That is, I assume that you mean the latency with
this proposal is due to the recursive still having to go fetch all the
pieces. However, if the recursive already has some or all of the answers
in its cache, this proposal reduces the latency compared to the stub
asking for each piece. Or, I might be misunderstanding why you think
there is no latency reduction.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
