I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG adoption.
Roy > On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:58, IETF Secretariat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > The document is available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
