Yah, me too. W On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM Roy Arends <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better > netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG > adoption. > > Roy > > > On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:58, IETF Secretariat < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state > > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > > > The document is available at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
