Noted! And I saw more email messages on this topic after I wrote this email of mine.
Happy to see not only I "miss" things when being AD :-) All the best! Patrik On 24 Apr 2016, at 15:22, Ted Lemon wrote: > Patrik, I think that it's fairly clear that the authors were assuming that > .home would be documented elsewhere when they wrote that text, so the problem > is simply that they never added a normative reference to the document > describing what .home does, and because of that nobody noticed that it was > being defined here for the first time. > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 24 Apr 2016, at 3:01, David Conrad wrote: >> >>> I would agree that it is interesting. Unsurprisingly, it is not in >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml. >> My gut feeling is that this is a process failure, but will admit that the >> whole question is quite unclear given the continuing uncertainty about the >> process described in 6761. >> >> There is also nothing in the IANA Considerations Section about adding >> .HOME to the registry, which I think is a big mistake. >> >> Either .HOME should not have been mentioned, or it should be added to the >> registry. >> >> Patrik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
