Patrik, I think that it's fairly clear that the authors were assuming that .home would be documented elsewhere when they wrote that text, so the problem is simply that they never added a normative reference to the document describing what .home does, and because of that nobody noticed that it was being defined here for the first time.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 Apr 2016, at 3:01, David Conrad wrote: > > > I would agree that it is interesting. Unsurprisingly, it is not in > http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml. > My gut feeling is that this is a process failure, but will admit that the > whole question is quite unclear given the continuing uncertainty about the > process described in 6761. > > There is also nothing in the IANA Considerations Section about adding > .HOME to the registry, which I think is a big mistake. > > Either .HOME should not have been mentioned, or it should be added to the > registry. > > Patrik > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
