I tend to think that they may be within scope for the problem statement, but it is likely that existing solutions (e.g. ICANN refusing to delegate them while they remain toxic) are adequate to deal with the problem.
David > On 19 Sep 2016, at 8:47 AM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > >> Dealing with toxic waste names is out of scope for the problem statement. > > Well, that's one theory. Let's see of other people agree. > > R's, > John > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
