----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <[email protected]> > To: "Ondřej Surý" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Bob Harold" <[email protected]>, "dnsop" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, 15 November, 2016 01:55:50 > Subject: Re: draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:46:55PM +0100, > Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 32 lines which said: > >> > There seems to be an assumption in this draft that the parent NS >> > records are always correct, but I would argue that this is not the >> > case. >> >> Nope, I don't think this is an assumption of this draft > > Yes, it is. Otherwise, what would be the point of using the NS in the > parent instead of the authoritative one? Let me rephrase it, the assumption here is that parent NS are: "as good as they get to resolve the names underneath", and that doesn't mean they are necessarily more or less "correct" than child NS. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow -------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic mailto:[email protected] https://nic.cz/ -------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
