On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Matt Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I think we'd better have a really good reason for adding a new > TLD without a requirement for DNSSEC. I further think that adding an > insecure delegation in the root for localhost to permit DNSSEC validation of > local names like foo.localhost is bad, because I think doing anything to > encourage names like foo.localhost is a very bad idea. When I see localhost > in whatever context, I think 127.0.0.1 and ::1. Any other answer would cause > astonishment.
Thanks, Matt. I agree completely about subdomains of localhost, FWIW.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
