On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31:12AM -0500, Matt Larson wrote:

>  That's an issue we (the community) would have to decide upon and document in 
> whatever document governed adding a hypothetical new TLD with an insecure 
> delegation.
>

If by "we (the community)" you mean "the names community", then I
agree.  That's the main point I've been trying to make: the decisions
about what to put _in the root zone_ (which includes delegation data
of special-use names) is, as near as I can tell, entirely on ICANN's
turf.  (I don't think the creation of special-use names at the root of
the namespace _is_ entirely on their turf, but actual data in the root
zone is quite different.)

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to