On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:48:59AM +0000, Warren Kumari wrote: > > (2) In a feature implemented for Unbound: > > > > - Unbound first checks cache > > > > - If a stale answer is found, its TTL is set to 0, and the cache entry > > is served > > > > - If a stale answer is found, Unbound starts something similar to > > prefetch/HAMMER. > > > > > NOTE: I believe that there may be (non-Google) IP associated with > > > this. A lawyer will be filing the IPR disclosure later today (time > > > zone differences, etc). > > > > The two approaches are somewhat different, and so at least one of them > > may not be covered by this patent. > > > > Yup. The IPR disclose was about IPR belonging to Xerocole. Xerocole was > acquired by Akamai in March 2015. I believe that David will discuss the IPR > with his employer.
Please explore if this patent can be circumvented without affecting the
goal of the draft, so that it does not apply. It would be better than
licensing it under some legal terms.
Consequently, if the patented method is strictly adopted, please include
an explanation of why it could not be circumvented.
Mukund
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
