On 1/6/17 9:25 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:48:59AM +0000, Warren Kumari wrote: >>> (2) In a feature implemented for Unbound: >>> >>> - Unbound first checks cache >>> >>> - If a stale answer is found, its TTL is set to 0, and the cache entry >>> is served >>> >>> - If a stale answer is found, Unbound starts something similar to >>> prefetch/HAMMER. >>> >>>> NOTE: I believe that there may be (non-Google) IP associated with >>>> this. A lawyer will be filing the IPR disclosure later today (time >>>> zone differences, etc). >>> The two approaches are somewhat different, and so at least one of them >>> may not be covered by this patent. >>> >> Yup. The IPR disclose was about IPR belonging to Xerocole. Xerocole was >> acquired by Akamai in March 2015. I believe that David will discuss the IPR >> with his employer. > Please explore if this patent can be circumvented without affecting the > goal of the draft, so that it does not apply. It would be better than > licensing it under some legal terms. IMHO this can be better expressed as a preference for unencumbered technology.
the working group should not as far as I am concerned get buried in how precisely to achieve that. > Consequently, if the patented method is strictly adopted, please include > an explanation of why it could not be circumvented. > > Mukund > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
