And because it’s been that day…. Thanks for the off-list nudge, that’s ***Thursday 16 February*** for most of the world, Friday 17 February for the AP region.
We’ve blocked two hours for the meeting. Apologies for the error. Suzanne > On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote: > 3. We still want (and have time) to do a virtual interim WG meeting before > Chicago. We’ve picked a date: > > Thursday 17 February, 19:00 UTC, which is: > > 19:00 UTC > 20:00 CEST (Frankfurt, Stockholm) > 14:00 EST (North American Eastern) > 11:00 PST (North American Western) > 06:00 AEDT (Sydney, Melbourne) > > (Webex details will follow) > > As usual, scheduling isn’t perfect for anyone but we tried to cover the > largest possible area of the globe adequately. > > Preliminary agenda for the meeting is: > > 1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>) > 2. Proposals for moving forward: > * reviews of alt-tld; ready for WGLC? will it help? > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>) > * stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process > registry changes case-by-case) > * proposals for process revision/update? > 3. Next steps: > * any drafts to write? > * any input or liaison to request from the IAB? (regarding > either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups) > 4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here > > > thanks, > Suzanne & Tim >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
