Hi,
The secretariat has graciously given us access to a webex login for the WG, so
the setup details for the virtual interim tomorrow are:
Meeting number: 644 850 881
Meeting password: special
Meeting link:
https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m420b562577eec300c73de2e3c9b7d49f
Audio connection:
1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada)
1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
Access code: 644 850 881
Agenda:
0. Intro/note well/agenda bash (chairs)
1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps) (authors)
2. Update on alt-tld
((https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/) (authors)
3. Proposals for moving forward:
* alt-tld to WGLC?
* stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process registry changes
case-by-case)
* proposals for process revision/update?
* any drafts to write?
* any input or liaison that DNSOP should request from the IAB? (regarding
either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups)
4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:48 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> And because it’s been that day….
>
> Thanks for the off-list nudge, that’s ***Thursday 16 February*** for most of
> the world, Friday 17 February for the AP region.
>
> We’ve blocked two hours for the meeting.
>
> Apologies for the error.
>
>
> Suzanne
>
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 3. We still want (and have time) to do a virtual interim WG meeting before
>> Chicago. We’ve picked a date:
>>
>> Thursday 17 February, 19:00 UTC, which is:
>>
>> 19:00 UTC
>> 20:00 CEST (Frankfurt, Stockholm)
>> 14:00 EST (North American Eastern)
>> 11:00 PST (North American Western)
>> 06:00 AEDT (Sydney, Melbourne)
>>
>> (Webex details will follow)
>>
>> As usual, scheduling isn’t perfect for anyone but we tried to cover the
>> largest possible area of the globe adequately.
>>
>> Preliminary agenda for the meeting is:
>>
>> 1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>)
>> 2. Proposals for moving forward:
>> * reviews of alt-tld; ready for WGLC? will it help?
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>)
>> * stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process
>> registry changes case-by-case)
>> * proposals for process revision/update?
>> 3. Next steps:
>> * any drafts to write?
>> * any input or liaison to request from the IAB? (regarding
>> either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups)
>> 4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Suzanne & Tim
>>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
