> On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Ralph Droms <[email protected]> wrote: >> As Matt Larson just pointed out, "different protocol" may turn into a >> distraction. .homenet is asking for an entry in the special-use domain name >> registry and a specific kind of entry in the DNS root zone. I take those >> characteristics to differentiate homenet, perhaps as an extension or variant >> of DNS. > > Is this even necessary?
"this" == "differentiate homenet from DNS"? > The MoU uses the example of in-addr.arpa, which is resolved using the DNS > protocol, so from the perspective of the MoU, I don't think it is. > I was mostly referring to the idea that DNSSEC will work because the homenet name resolution mechanism is "just DNS". I thought it was important to point out that homenet name resolution isn't exactly DNS, so we should be careful to make assumptions about its behavior based on DNS. - Ralph _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
