bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 10:20:00AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> Just to avoid any confusion: Although I demonstrated the issue by >> running BIND on my laptop only, the real usage scenario is resolver >> service for a few million distinct administrative domains (aka >> "customers"). Changing the trust anchor is not an option. > > Perhaps https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users is a great place > to discuss BIND configurations and issues.
Definitely. Or even bind-workers when it comes to questions about the reason for making static-stub zones recursive only. The reason I ask here first, is because RFC 7706 includes a BIND specific configuration example (as well as examples for other recursive server software). So before considering changing config or code, I wanted to know the background of that example. Was there a real reason for the obscure(?) "static-stub" zone type, or was that just an arbitrary choice? My apologies if this is considered OT here. I will shut up now. Bjørn _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
