Hi Dave, Thanks for your feedback, :-)
Dave Lawrence <[email protected]>于2017年7月17日周一 下午5:01写道： > Have you had any feedback from authority server implementers who are > interested in using this? > We plan to contact authoritative server implementers and public recursive implementers, for further realistic using, welcome cooperation. I'm having a hard time picturing many CDNs wanting to switch, in no > small part because geo is not the only goal of mapping. The > < COUNTRY, AREA, ISP > tuple that is defined is insufficient. > Not "switch to", but we can try to add *an alternative solution* for GeoIP-enabled Authoritative Nameserver *with user privacy concern*. CDN can do all analysis based on client ip *without ECS and EIL*, because it is data provider, every client will visit. The < COUNTRY, AREA, ISP > tuple *can be sufficient for GeoIP-enabled Authoritative Nameserver*, because the Authoritative Nameserver map client ip into geolocation, and then return the tailored response based on geolocation, such as Appendix A. GeoIP-enabled Nameservers Example <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-dnsop-edns-isp-location-02#section-10> . More details in Section 1.1 Path Calculation and Tailored DNS Response <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-dnsop-edns-isp-location-02#section-1.1> . -- 致礼 Best Regards 潘蓝兰 Pan Lanlan
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
