Hi, Dave Lawrence wrote: > Have you had any feedback from authority server implementers who are > interested in using this?
As an authority server implementer at a CDN -- we have no interest in using anything like this. > I'm having a hard time picturing many CDNs wanting to switch, in no > small part because geo is not the only goal of mapping. The > < COUNTRY, AREA, ISP > tuple that is defined is insufficient. Yes, as has been made clear in previous discussion on this document. Even if it were sufficient, using only a <COUNTRY, AREA, ISP> tuple to direct traffic makes it incumbent on the resolver operator to accurately geolocate the client IP and faithfully transmit the result to the authoritative operator. If the resolver operator is an ISP, this proposal would give the ISP an enormous amount of counter- traffic engineering power by spoofing the COUNTRY/AREA fields. -- Robert Edmonds _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
