read, support adoption. suggest that favourite band sections be marked 'RFC-ED REMOVE' because the last time somebody thanked their mother, the backing band, their agent, the producers, the other candidates for award... it wound up on the ietf list and we don't want to go there.
I am unsure about the R flag and proscriptive language. It seems to me that it can't be a single bit flag and suggest BOTH retry, and retry another NS. Also, the rest of the flag word is set zero. Surely thats '...at this time' And then the list of when to set, maybe set, maybe not set.. I think thats still a bit up in the air. But thats now WG matter to discuss I guess (assuming it got adopted) On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Peter DeVries <[email protected]> wrote: > I have read the draft and support adoption. I plan to review and > contribute. > > Peter > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:04 PM, tjw ietf <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This draft was the only one which seemed to have broad support in some >> form during the meeting last week. >> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-wkumari-dnsop-extended-error >> >> The draft is available here: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-extended-error-02 >> >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. >> >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. >> >> This call for adoption ends: 8 August 2017, 23:59 >> >> Thanks, >> tim wicinski >> DNSOP co-chair >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
