On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:31, Joe Abley wrote:
Some other RFC numbers were clearly reserved for specific documents in the past (e.g. see RFC 2821/2, obsoleting RFC 821/2) but perhaps those were special cases.
It was special, and very much regretted by the RFC Editor at the time. This badly screwed up the numbering at the time because 2821/2822 ended up being over a year late.
--Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
