On 5 Apr 2018, at 18:35, tjw ietf wrote:
After walking through the 168 emails on this draft in the inbox, I
we're ready to take this to WGLC.
(We are aware of the two points raised my Job and Paul)
Especially given that an implementation is in fact available (in Knot),
why not take this opportunity to start demanding Implementation Status
sections for those drafts where that requirement makes sense? Because it
certainly makes sense here!
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
DNSOP mailing list