Darcy Kevin (FCA) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Having said that, even RFC 1034 admits that the non-dot-terminated form
> “is often one where the trailing dot has been omitted to save typing”,
> so if the document wants to give a nod to how DNS names are typically
> represented in practice, that would also be fine, albeit slightly less
> pedantic.
To be truly pedantic it should mention that some protocols (mail at least)
forbid a trailing dot :-)
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/
Humber, Thames, Dover, Wight, Portland: East 4 or 5, occasionally 6 except in
Dover, becoming variable 4 at times. Slight or moderate, occasionally rough in
Humber and Portland. Rain or showers, thundery except in Humber, fog patches.
Moderate or good, occasionally very poor.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
