On 10 Jul 2018, at 13:25, Michael StJohns wrote:
Finally, this purports to update RFC7538 which is Informational.
That's a good point. The WG draft that led to RFC 7538 was marked as
Informational for its entire lifetime, so the WG must have thought it
was OK to treat key rollover timing considerations as Informational.
*sigh* Sorry - RFC7583 - not 7538.
We both gave the wrong number, but what you say and what I say still
stands: this WG earlier decided that an earlier document on key rollover
timing considerations was Informational.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
