Dick, good catch!

Tim, do you want me to publish -04 addressing this or would it be better to fix 
this in RFC Editor queue.

The diff is simple:

https://github.com/oerdnj/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/commit/7164f8a6ee4b210f5d83684156cb2905769f7fb4#diff-e9d2d55442440292530838192590a871

O.
--
Ondřej Surý
[email protected]

> On 23 Oct 2018, at 22:37, Dick Franks <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The WGLC has completed and we were waiting on the authors on addressing all 
> comments and updating their document. 
> The chairs feel this is ready to proceed. 
> 
> Just spotted a fumble with document references in section 3.1 which will need 
> to be fixed before this is put to bed.
> 
> [3.1, para 6] reads:
>    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.11-94) has been superseded by GOST R 34.11-2012
>    in [
> RFC6986
> ].  The GOST R 34.11-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
>    in DNSSEC.
> 
> should read: 
>    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.10-2001) has been superseded by GOST R 34.10-2012
>    in [
> RFC7091
> ].  The GOST R 34.10-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
>    in DNSSEC.
> 
> 
> I apologise for not having noticed this earlier.
> 
> 
> -- Dick
> 
> 
> 
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to