Versions are cheap. spin a new one while I work on the shepherd write up

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:04 PM Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dick, good catch!
>
> Tim, do you want me to publish -04 addressing this or would it be better
> to fix this in RFC Editor queue.
>
> The diff is simple:
>
>
> https://github.com/oerdnj/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/commit/7164f8a6ee4b210f5d83684156cb2905769f7fb4#diff-e9d2d55442440292530838192590a871
>
> O.
> --
> Ondřej Surý
> [email protected]
>
> > On 23 Oct 2018, at 22:37, Dick Franks <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The WGLC has completed and we were waiting on the authors on addressing
> all comments and updating their document.
> > The chairs feel this is ready to proceed.
> >
> > Just spotted a fumble with document references in section 3.1 which will
> need to be fixed before this is put to bed.
> >
> > [3.1, para 6] reads:
> >    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.11-94) has been superseded by GOST R 34.11-2012
> >    in [
> > RFC6986
> > ].  The GOST R 34.11-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
> >    in DNSSEC.
> >
> > should read:
> >    ECC-GOST (GOST R 34.10-2001) has been superseded by GOST R 34.10-2012
> >    in [
> > RFC7091
> > ].  The GOST R 34.10-2012 hasn't been standardized for use
> >    in DNSSEC.
> >
> >
> > I apologise for not having noticed this earlier.
> >
> >
> > -- Dick
> >
> >
> >
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to