On 07. 02. 19 13:39, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Why would NS at the apex be mandatory?   What breaks if it’s not there?
> 
> (Playing the devil’s advocate—I’m also curious about this, but I think the 
> answer is that nothing breaks.)

When looking at it from resolver perspective, what is the resolver
supposed to do with query "zone. NS" if there is no authoritative NS set
in the zone? Return NOERROR+NODATA?

Returning non-authoritative NS set in ANSWER section sounds wrong to me.

-- 
Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to