> On 7 Feb 2019, at 11:16 pm, Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello dnsop,
> 
> here is a quiz for experienced RFC archeologists:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035#section-5.2
> section 5.2. Use of master files to define zones
> does not mention NS at apex at all, but it does explicitly mention SOA
> at apex. Can it be interpreted as if NS at apex is not mandatory?

No.  Go read RFC 1034.

> Funnily enough
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1035#section-5.3
> has an example which as NS at apex, but it is not clear from the text above.
> 
> Is it mandatory or not? Should I submit erratum for RFC 1035?
> 
> Thank you for clarification.
> 
> -- 
> Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to