On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:48:36PM -0800, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote a message of 46 lines which said:
> increased for political reasons. There is nothing wrong with political reasons. Mass surveillance is a political problem (privacy). DNS lies by ISPs is a political problem (network neutrality). It is perfectly normal that IETF develops stuff for political reasons. (Everybody have read RFC 8280?) > google, ibm, cloudflare, cisco, and other so-called "public dns" > providers will at some point choose whether to offer DoH from shared > addresses, making those shared addresses into risks that the rest of > us have to manage differently; or whether to dedicate DoH to well > known addresses that can be outright blocked. It seems to be an issue with DoC <https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/>, not really DoH itself. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
