The table in section 3.3 ("DS and CDS Algorithms") of the draft states that
SHA-1 is "MUST NOT" for "DNSSEC Delegation" but in the narrative text under the
table it states "SHA-1 [...] is NOT RECOMMENDED for use in generating new DS
and CDS records."
The two statements should be consistent in the final RFC.
Yours,
Mats
---
Mats Dufberg
DNS Specialist, IIS
Mobile: +46 73 065 3899
https://www.iis.se/en/
-----Original Message-----
From: DNSOP <[email protected]> on behalf of The IESG
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 at 20:30
To: IETF-Announce <[email protected]>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05.txt>
(Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC) to
Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Algorithm Implementation
Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC'
<draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
[email protected] mailing lists by 2019-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
The DNSSEC protocol makes use of various cryptographic algorithms in
order to provide authentication of DNS data and proof of non-
existence. To ensure interoperability between DNS resolvers and DNS
authoritative servers, it is necessary to specify a set of algorithm
implementation requirements and usage guidelines to ensure that there
is at least one algorithm that all implementations support. This
document defines the current algorithm implementation requirements
and usage guidance for DNSSEC. This document obsoletes [RFC6944].
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop