On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:13 AM Peter van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2019, at 20:29, The IESG wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations > > WG > > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Algorithm > > Implementation > > Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC' > > <draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05.txt> as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > [email protected] mailing lists by 2019-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may > > be > > sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the > > beginning of > > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > As this pertains to a section that will apparently be removed for > publication, only posting it here on dnsop@ for historical reasons: > > So, RFC7942 (the one about "The Implementation Status" section) says that this section should contain a note asking for it to be removed (and even includes boilerplate to copy and paste) -- this document instead says "The following table contains the status of support in the open-source DNS signers and validators in the current released versions as of the time writing this document." which implies it will be left in the document. I personally think that this is good / helpful, but am not sure how the rest of the IESG will feel about this... As of 28-Feb-2019 14:02 I see pdns-4.2.0-beta1 available for download, so I think that doing what Peter requests is fine. So, my plan is to 1: ask the authors to please swap the Y to an N as below and 2: progress the document with the hope that this section will survive the publication process. The March telechats are often really full - ADs who are leaving the IESG try and get old / stuck work finished and off their plate - and so this would likely only show up on the 2019-04-11 telechat -- so if anyone really objects to this being (attempted to be) left in, please shout. W > PowerDNS has removed all GOST support as of version 4.2, which is due to > be released any day now, so please change that cell in section 6.1 to N. > > Kind regards, > -- > Peter van Dijk > PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
