I have yet to seen a justification for using SHAKE128 vs any of the existing
hash algorithms used in DNS.  You really need to justify this choice on security
concerns.  DNS server implementers need to support multiple crypto backends and
adding yet another algorithm is not as easy as just calling OpenSSL.  It’s 
writing /
expanding a shim layer.  It’s checking for the existence on all the platforms
the server is built on.  Just closing the issue isn’t addressing it.

https://github.com/pusateri/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout/issues/19

> On 19 Feb 2019, at 10:34 am, Tom Pusateri <pusat...@bangj.com> wrote:
> 
> DNSOP,
> 
> We have updated the TIMEOUT resource record draft based on the great feedback 
> from Mark Andrews, Joe Abley, Ted Lemon, and Paul Vixie. I think we have 
> addressed all of the comments except for the Date format concern from Mark. 
> That is still an outstanding issue. Please comment on it if you have an 
> opinion or feel free to open other issues against the document or send 
> comments to the list.
> 
> The TIMEOUT RR is just like any other resource record now with no special 
> handling.
> 
> Issues are on Github:
> https://github.com/pusateri/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout/issues
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom & Tim
> 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
>> Date: February 18, 2019 at 6:26:35 PM EST
>> To: "Tim Wattenberg" <m...@timwattenberg.de>, "Tom Pusateri" 
>> <pusat...@bangj.com>
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Tom Pusateri and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:                draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
>> Revision:    01
>> Title:               DNS TIMEOUT Resource Record
>> Document date:       2019-02-18
>> Group:               Individual Submission
>> Pages:               13
>> URL:            
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
>> Status:         
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout/
>> Htmlized:       
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01
>> Htmlized:       
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
>> Diff:           
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   This specification defines a new DNS TIMEOUT resource record (RR)
>>   that associates a lifetime with one or more zone resource records
>>   with the same owner name, type, and class.  It is intended to be used
>>   to transfer resource record lifetime state between a zone's primary
>>   and secondary servers and to store lifetime state during server
>>   software restarts.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to