I strongly support moving it to Historic. Regards, -drc
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > > A while back I was asked why BIND 9 still had code to do DLV. Good > question, and we asked our users if they would mind if we remove the > code. Almost everyone was okay with that. > > So ISC plans to deprecate the feature in BIND 9. But also I think it is > time to move the protocol to Historic status as a clear signal to > everyone that it should no longer be implemented or deployed. > > Dan Mahoney cleared the only well-known DLV registry almost two years > ago. Here's a draft with discussion why also the protocol should go > away. We would like to hear what you think about it. > > > Best regards, > > Matthijs > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > A new version of I-D, draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Matthijs Mekking and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv > Revision: 00 > Title: Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status > Pages: 5 > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/> > > Abstract: > This document obsoletes DNSSEC lookaside validation (DLV) and > reclassifies RFCs 4431 and 5074 as Historic. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
