On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:13 PM Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> wrote:
> Hi, > > > A while back I was asked why BIND 9 still had code to do DLV. Good > question, and we asked our users if they would mind if we remove the > code. Almost everyone was okay with that. > > So ISC plans to deprecate the feature in BIND 9. But also I think it is > time to move the protocol to Historic status as a clear signal to > everyone that it should no longer be implemented or deployed. > > Dan Mahoney cleared the only well-known DLV registry almost two years > ago. Here's a draft with discussion why also the protocol should go > away. We would like to hear what you think about it. > > I think that it's worth going forward. ISC BIND commit: https://github.com/isc-projects/bind9/commit/f29359299aaab519f39b090cd83de85cd2fc3820 > Best regards, > > Matthijs > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > A new version of I-D, draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Matthijs Mekking and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv > Revision: 00 > Title: Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status > Pages: 5 > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mekking-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ > > Abstract: > This document obsoletes DNSSEC lookaside validation (DLV) and > reclassifies RFCs 4431 and 5074 as Historic. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
