And the existing system is not consistently formatted, this would create a parseable and consistent standard.
And would bypass GDPR concerns by registries. On 7/10/19 3:14 PM, David Conrad wrote: > Philip, > > On Jul 10, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Philip Homburg > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> With that in mind, it seems that this proposal doesn't address any >> technical >> issues with whois. > > Maybe rate limiting by most (all?) whois servers? > > Regards, > -drc > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
