On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, Warren Kumari wrote:
[0]: There is lore that the IESG actually halted reservations under the 6761 process, but that doesn't seem to be the case, or, if it is, I cannot find a reference; if there is anything saying so, can someone please send a link?
If this refers to my comments, which I've given a number of times in response to this issue, it was DNSOP and not IESG that halted this as far as I remember. You can likely find it in some of the dnsop recordings of a year+ ago, but I doubt many have the energy to do listen to a year of dnsop meetings. If we are resolving this issue now, then it is moot anyway. The reason I brought this up various times, is because (IMHO) DNSOP made a rather arbitrary decision to process .onion under the 6761 rules, but stopped every other name from using the same privilege. There might be messages in the list archive on this. I know Suzanne Woolf does not think my view represent how she remembers the events unfolding. Calling it "lore" though makes me feel like Data's evil twin :P Anyway, since we are addressing the problem now, even though it is unpleasant, is a good thing and the history does not matter that much to me. I will review the document later and respond in a separate message Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
