Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> writes:
Thanks Stephane,
Thanks for the comments. Responses are inline below in my tracking
notes below.
14.3 DONE Stephane Bortzmeyer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IMHO, the document is good. I like the fact there is no longer a
limitation of a given EDE to some RCODEs (it makes things simpler).
Some details, all editorial:
14.3.1 DONE it could be a good idea to add more specific references for the
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDE. For instance, 3 "Stale Answer" could have a reference to
draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale.
+ Rseponse that seems popular; I'll try to do this where I can.
14.3.2 DONE I think that many people will be confused with 15, 16, 17 and 18.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suggestions:
* remove 18, which is redundant with 15 (if the user chooses the
resolver, and he should have the right to do so, 15 and 18 are the
same). 18 is meaningful only if the user does have a simple way to
change this behaviour.
* Add to the definition of 15 "The policy was decided by the server
administrators"
* Add to the definition of 16 "This means that the policy was
not decided by the server administrators, and it is probably useless
to complain to them".
+ Response: Those three codes were supplied in a previous comment
round and they are supposed to indicate policies being applied from
different sources. Can you check the new text of them to see if
they are more understandable now?
--
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
