extended codes are pretty important in the DoH space - which doesn't require library intermediaries. IIRC the very important use case was disambiguating DNSSEC validation errors from other errors (as retry behavior could very well be different). So this has been eagerly anticipated.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > > > 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a > > consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft? > > Is it useful as it is? > > I expect almost no-one can do anything with EDE without > getaddrinfo() EAI_ return code extensions. > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > Plymouth: Variable 4 or less. Smooth or slight, occasionally moderate > later in > west. Mainly fair. Good._______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
