On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Vittorio Bertola <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Il 23/04/2020 20:14 Warren Kumari <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:04 AM Vittorio Bertola > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Indeed, thinking at the possible use case for those error codes, it would > > > make sense for the forwarder to forward them to the final user. Perhaps > > > we can fix the language to make this clear? E.g., instead or "the server > > > being directly talked to", "the server actually resolving the queries" or > > > something like that? > > > > In my view your proposed text is simple, clear, and addresses the issue... > > Well, to be honest, picky people might argue that also the forwarder, while > normally only relaying queries and replies, might sometimes decide to filter > one and thus apply the codes. If one felt the need to explicitly allow this > case, the text could be "the server resolving or forwarding the queries". In > any case, the meaning of the codes should be clear enough that people > understand when their use makes sense... hopefully.
That's even better. It is also theoretically possible that the authoritative could send this, but this is sufficiently far into the pathological case that it can be ignored... W > > -- > > Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange > [email protected] > Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
