Thank you Duane for the quick reply and for taking into account my comments

Regards

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: iesg <[email protected]> on behalf of "Wessels, Duane" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2020 at 22:08
To: Eric Vyncke <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, The IESG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:  Éric Vyncke's No Objection on 
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: (with COMMENT)



    > On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:47 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker 
<[email protected]> wrote:
    > 
    > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
    > draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: No Objection
    > 
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > COMMENT:
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > Thank you for the work put into this document. I really like the idea of
    > protecting the zone integrity even at rest.
    > 
    > Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT points and one nit. I would 
really
    > appreciate a reply for my comment about section 1.2.
    > 
    > I hope that this helps to improve the document,
    > 
    > Regards,
    > 
    > -éric
    > 
    > == COMMENTS ==
    > -- Section 1.2 --
    > Why is draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls not mentioned in this section as an
    > alternative for data on the move?

    Just an oversight.  The document does (did) mention "a future version of 
DNS-over-TLS"
    which I think was meant as a reference to draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls 
when that was
    just getting started.  Ben pointed this out as well and I suggest changing 
the text to this:

       The Transport Layer Security protocol suite also provides channel
       security.  The DPRIVE working group is in the process of specifying
       DNS Zone Transfer-over-TLS [I-D.ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls].


    > 
    > == NITS ==
    > -- Section 1.4.3 --
    > Suggest to add "(RPZ)" after the first use of the expansion.
    > 


    Done.

    DW



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to