On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:38 PM Shumon Huque <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:28 PM Shivan Kaul Sahib < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Stephane! >> >>> >>> Section 4.1: you do not mention a recommended name for the >>> subdomain. Should we suggest a name starting with an underscore, to >>> limit the risk of collisions and to emphasize it is not a host name? >>> (On the other hand, some users may have a limited DNS provisioning >>> interface, which enforces a LDH restriction.) >>> >> >> This draft is intended to be a survey of existing techniques and broad >> recommendations that can be derived from the survey (hence we only discuss >> the value of targeted domain verification). Our thought was that we should >> leave concrete best practices for a later draft. >> > > Shivan: a survey is the initial goal. But my thinking was: assuming there > is interest in the draft first (which there appears to be), we could work > on recommendations in a later iteration of this draft (and not a new one, > although I could be persuaded). > > Yes, Stephane, we were envisioning recommending an underscore label. Of > course, that leads to how to avoid collisions in that space, and whether we > need to establish a registry of application service names. > You mean, a different registry than this one https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#underscored-globally-scoped-dns-node-names tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
