On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:50 PM Shumon Huque <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:46 PM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Yes, Stephane, we were envisioning recommending an underscore label. Of >>> course, that leads to how to avoid collisions in that space, and whether we >>> need to establish a registry of application service names. >>> >> >> You mean, a different registry than this one >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#underscored-globally-scoped-dns-node-names >> >> tim >> > > Tim - yes, I think this would be a bit different. The above is for IETF > defined protocols. This one (if we think it's a good idea) would have to > encompass arbitrary Internet application services, many that could be > proprietary services of companies. > > Shumon. > > Ok, I can see that. The survey you're doing will help with that. tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
