> On 13 Jul 2021, at 11:13 pm, Brian Dickson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> For example, in evaluating the break-points when partitioning the labels to
> limit the total number of queries, the sequence COULD treat any contiguous
> sequence of underscore labels as if it were a single label, and then do its
> partitioning of labels using the same relative logic.
FWIW, my take is that treating consecutive special-use labels as a single label
only to resume minimisation at some subsequent non-special-use label sounds too
complex to me. Intermediate special-use labels are just as likely to be ENTs
and to not be privacy-relevant zone cuts even when some labels below are not
special-use.
So whether it is MAY or SHOULD, my sense is that if an implementation chooses
to implement the proposed strategy it should just make the final query at
that point.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
