Paul, Thanks for bringing this up. I feel this topic is also relevant to the draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional draft currently being worked on. While I am sure folks are aware of this, this is more of a note that having the definitions clarified will help us move this other draft forward.
thanks tim (and Tony - always thanks!) On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:23 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings again. I think that all of the issues from the WG on > draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis have been dealt with, except one significant > one. Almost a year ago, Tony Finch started a thread about 8499's > definitions of bailiwick and sibling glue. The thread is > < > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5bKXkqzCyGE1NuUko9M6wXLD5bI/> > < > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fAopdUTnVS2mDF71eiGsRdu9zco/> > < > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PqH_WMhsP5zxRfjKD4gtmf6nw54/> > > The WG should come to agreement on this so that we can close out the > document. Please read these messages and comment here about changes you do > or don't want to be made to the current draft. > > --Paul Hoffman_______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
