I agree with Petr here. On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:56 AM Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11. 11. 21 17:56, Joe Abley wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > > > I like the idea of cleaning this up. > > > > Choosing nsap.int as an example, I think it would be useful to either > update RFC 1706 to make it clear that the advice in section 6 of that > document no longer applies, and that no reverse mapping for NSAP is > provided in the DNS. I don't think this is a great operational necessity > since I imagine the number of people who expect this to work is > approximately zero but it seems good to be tidy. > > > > [I'd suggest reclassifying 1706 to historic but that'd also affect the > specification for the NSAP RRType; maybe that's a good idea too, but it > seems outside the scope of what you are trying to achieve, and I don't know > how we would confirm that it's a good idea.] > > > > Similar comment for other domains where there's similar existing advice. > > FTR I can't see any problems with that, and suggest to do that in one go > in this document. We have enough RFCs already and wasting more numbers > (and work) on simple deprecation does not sound useful to me. > > Petr Špaček > > > > > > Happy to offer actual text if that seems useful. > > > > > > Joe > > > >> On 11 Nov 2021, at 11:38, Kim Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Colleagues, > >> > >> I wanted to draw your attention to an Internet Draft we’ve developed, > >> its goal is to formally deprecate a number of historic “.int” > >> domains that were designated for Internet infrastructure purposes > >> decades ago and appear for all intents and purposes obsolete. After some > >> limited consultation on developing the approach so far, it would be > >> useful to get some additional eyes on it so we have greater confidence > >> there is nothing we’ve missed. > >> > >> Datatracker link: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davies-int-historic/ > >> > >> It’s a short document, but at its heart we’ve identified the > >> following domains that are referenced in places but seem to be obsolete: > >> > >> atma.int, ip4.int, nsap.int, rdi.int, reg.int, tpc.int > >> > >> Most of these are not delegated in the int zone any longer, but there > >> are lingering references to them. > >> > >> Thanks in advance for any insight, and apologies if you get this message > >> in duplicate, > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
