Joe Abley wrote:
The operational decisions relating to these things have already been
made, as I understand it -- the delegations no longer exist. Kim and
Amanda's document seems to have two purposes: (1) to document this
operational reality, and (2) to update protocol specifications to
reflect that operational reality.
I'm afraid (1) should be documented by a separate rfc maybe titled
as "Relationship between IETF and IANA", which should clarify
semantics of "IANA considerations" section of not only this but
also other rfcs, which was not a problem when both of the rfc
editor and IANA was the same person.
Is the "IANA considerations" section just a recommendation from
IETF/ISOC to IANA/ICANN or approved by IANA/ICANN during *modified*
standardization process of IETF?
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
